Journal of Asian and African Social Science and Humanities https://aarcentre.com/ojs3/index.php/jaash <p><strong>FOCUS AND SCOPE</strong></p> <p>Journal of Asian and African Social Science and Humanities (E-ISSN: 2413-2748) is a double-blind, peer -reviewed journal. The journal publishes research papers in the fields of humanities and social science such as anthropology, business studies, communication studies, corporate governance, criminology, cross cultural studies, demography, development studies, economics, education, ethics, geography, history, industrial relations, international relations, law, linguistics, library science, media studies, methodology, philosophy, political science, population Studies, psychology, public administration, sociology, social welfare, linguistics, literature, paralegal, performing arts (music, theatre &amp; dance), religious studies, visual arts, women studies and so on.</p> <p><strong>PUBLICATION FREQUENCY</strong></p> <p>Journal of Asian and African Social Science and Humanities publishes issue quarterly in a year (in March, June, September and December), with a dedicated mission of contributing to original and high quality research.</p> <p><strong>OPPEN ACCESS POLICY</strong></p> <p>All articles published open access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read, download, copy and distribute.</p> <p><strong>COPYRIGHT NOTICE</strong></p> <div> <p>The copyrights of article is on the Author(s), however, before publishing, it is required to obtain written confirmation from authors in order to ensure the originality (Author Statement of Originality). This statement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable.</p> </div> <p><strong>PLAGIARISM ISSUES</strong></p> <p>The manuscript must represent original work by the author(s). None of the material should be covered by any copyright; if copyrighted material exceeding approximately 100 words from a journal article or approximately 500 words from a book is used, the author has obtained written permission for its use. Further, this work should not infringe any intellectual property rights/secrecy laws of any person/organization/government/public or private agency, nor should it contain any defamatory matter. <strong>All the article will be checked by Turnitin Software.</strong></p> <p>This journal does not bear any responsibility for verifying copyright permissions provided by the author. Any breach of copyright laws will result in retraction of the published article/material as well as reporting to relevant authorities at the author's institutions.</p> <p><strong>Digital Archive: </strong>This Journal is using<strong> LOCKSS </strong>digital archive system<strong>.</strong></p> <p><strong>PUBLICATION CHARGES</strong></p> <p>If the paper is accepted for publication, author(s) will be asked to pay 100 USD as article publication. The publication fees cover the cost of language editing, copyediting, and other editorial expenses. There is no charge <em>during article submission</em>. Publication fees <em>will be charged once the paper</em> is accepted. The payment method will be notified by the editor after the acceptance of the paper. This journal encourages collaborative work. Authors from three different nationalities will get full discount on publication fees.</p> <p><strong>EDITORS' RESPONSIBILITIES</strong></p> <ul> <li>To act in a objective, balanced, and fair way while carrying out expected duties, without discrimination on grounds of gender, religious or political beliefs, ethnic or geographical origin of the authors.</li> <li>To avoid any commercial influence, as well as conflicts of interests, for all submissions and evaluate them solely on academic and scientific merit.</li> <li>To address complaints of any nature and follow reasonable procedures according to the Journal's policies.</li> <li>To give authors full opportunity to respond to complaints.</li> <li>To investigate a complaint regardless of the approval date of publication of an article.</li> <li>To document, compile, and file all complaints.</li> </ul> <p><strong>REVIEWERS' RESPONSIBILITIES</strong></p> <ul> <li>To review the manuscript objectively and timely, inform the editor of a suitable decision and to uphold the quality of articles published in the journal.</li> <li>To maintain strict confidentiality of any information supplied to the reviewer in the review process by the editor or author and ensure that the manuscript is for the reviewer's eyes only and no copies are transmitted or kept.</li> <li>To inform the editor of suspected plagiarism or absence of relevant published work which has not been cited. To avoid any potential conflicts of interests between the author and the reviewer and inform the editor of all developments. </li> </ul> <p><strong>AUTHORS' RESPONSIBILITIES</strong></p> <ul> <li>To ensure that they have significantly contributed to the research, cited all related references and acknowledged financial support from funding agencies.</li> <li>To maintain accurate records of data associated with their submitted manuscript, and supply or provide access to these data, on reasonable request.</li> <li>To confirm that the submitted manuscript is not under consideration or accepted for publication elsewhere.</li> <li>To acknowledge and cite sources whose contents overlap in the submitted paper. </li> <li>To provide the editor with a copy of any submitted manuscript(s) that might contain similar closely related or overlapping content.</li> <li>To ensure that any studies involving human or animal subjects conform to national, local and institutional laws and requirements.</li> <li>To confirm that approval has been sought and obtained where appropriate and obtain written permission from human subjects and respect their privacy.</li> <li>To declare any potential conflicts of interests.</li> <li>To promptly inform the journal editor or publisher if a significant error in their publication is detected and submit an erratum, addendum, corrigendum notice, to be published or retract the paper altogether if it is necessary.</li> </ul> <p><strong>ETHICAL STATEMENT</strong></p> <p>The manuscript must represent original work by the author(s). None of the material should be covered by any copyright; if copyrighted material exceeding approximately 100 words from a journal article or approximately 500 words from a book is used, the author has obtained written permission for its use. Further, this work should not infringe any intellectual property rights/secrecy laws of any person/organization/government/public or private agency, nor should it contain any defamatory matter.</p> <p>This journal does not bear any responsibility for verifying copyright permissions provided by the author. Any breach of copyright laws will result in retraction of the published article/material <strong>as well as reporting to relevant authorities at the authors' institutions.</strong></p> <p><strong>DISCLAIMER</strong></p> <p>Opinions expressed in articles and creative pieces published in this Journal are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editors, the editorial board or the publisher.</p> ASIAN AND AFRICAN RESEARCH CENTRE en-US Journal of Asian and African Social Science and Humanities 2413-2748 <p style="display: block; text-align: justify;">Copyrights for articles published in Journal of Asian and African Social Science and Humanities are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.</p><p>Articles published in Journal of Asian and African Social Science and Humanities are published under the <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license</a>, which permits others to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work as long as they credit you for the original creation.</p><p> </p> SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION IN BANGLADESH: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES https://aarcentre.com/ojs3/index.php/jaash/article/view/470 <p class="isSelectedEnd">Bangladesh exemplifies a central paradox of sustainable development: how to maintain rapid economic and social progress without undermining the ecological systems upon which development depends. This paper critically examines Bangladesh's environmental governance architecture, the major barriers to its effective implementation, and opportunities for achieving a just green transition. It adopts a qualitative, desk-based methodology combining doctrinal legal analysis with critical examination of national policies and plans, international commitments, judicial decisions, and institutional reports.</p> <p class="isSelectedEnd">The analysis demonstrates that Bangladesh has an extensive environmental legal and policy framework, including constitutional obligations, pollution-control legislation, environmental courts, climate strategies, and long-term delta planning. However, its implementation remains constrained by fragmented institutional authority, inconsistent enforcement, inadequate monitoring capacity, weaknesses in environmental assessment procedures, limited local government capacity, and continuing incentives for environmentally harmful investments.</p> <p class="isSelectedEnd">Climate vulnerability further intensifies these governance challenges, disproportionately affecting low-income and climate-vulnerable communities. Nevertheless, significant opportunities exist for a just green transition through renewable energy, resource-efficient industries, circular production systems, nature-based adaptation, sustainable agriculture, green finance, and digitally enabled environmental accountability.</p> <p>The paper proposes a reform agenda centred on enforceable environmental standards, strategic environmental assessment, open environmental data, stronger institutional coordination, enhanced local capacity, effective application of the polluter-pays principle, and meaningful public participation. Sustainable development in Bangladesh will become credible only when environmental protection becomes a binding condition of development decision-making rather than a remedial response after environmental damage has occurred.</p> Sayed Abdullah Bari Mumtahina Mahmud Samsun nahar Sema Maruf Ahmed Copyright (c) 2026 sayed Abdullah Bari, Muntahina Mahamud, Samsunnahar Sema; Maruf Ahmed http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2026-10-08 2026-10-08 12 1 1 20 10.55327/jaash.v12i1.470 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN BANGLADESH: LEGAL CHALLENGES AND FUTURE PROSPECTS https://aarcentre.com/ojs3/index.php/jaash/article/view/463 <p>Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming legal systems across the world by improving judicial efficiency, enhancing case management, supporting legal research, and facilitating access to justice. Many jurisdictions have introduced AI-assisted technologies to reduce case backlogs, improve administrative functions, and increase the efficiency of court services. While AI has the potential to strengthen judicial administration, its integration into the justice system also raises significant legal, ethical, and constitutional concerns relating to transparency, accountability, algorithmic bias, data protection, and judicial independence. In Bangladesh, the judiciary has made considerable progress in digitalizing court services through initiatives such as virtual courts, e-filing, and digital case management systems. However, the application of AI in judicial administration remains at a preliminary stage, and the country currently lacks a comprehensive legal framework governing the responsible use of AI within the justice sector. This regulatory gap creates uncertainty regarding the protection of fundamental rights, due process, and judicial accountability.</p> <p>This article critically examines the prospects and challenges of integrating Artificial Intelligence into the administration of justice in Bangladesh. It analyzes the existing constitutional and legal framework, evaluates international developments concerning AI governance, and explores the legal and institutional reforms necessary to ensure that AI serves as a tool to support, rather than replace, judicial decision-making. The article argues that a transparent, accountable, and human-centred regulatory framework is essential for promoting innovation while preserving judicial independence, the rule of law, and public confidence in the justice system.</p> Rajia Sultana Sunjida Islam Copyright (c) 2026 Rajia Sultana , Sunjida Islam http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2026-10-08 2026-10-08 12 1 21 37 10.55327/jaash.v12i1.463 ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN BANGLADESH: EFFECTIVENESS, ACCESSIBILITY, AND PUBLIC CONFIDENCE https://aarcentre.com/ojs3/index.php/jaash/article/view/467 <p>Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) has gained a greater significance in enhancing access to justice, lessening procedural burdens, and offering adaptable dispute solving mechanisms in Bangladesh. This paper will look at the effects of accessibility on the perceived effectiveness of ADR and the confidence of the people, as well as investigate whether perceived effectiveness moderates the relationship between access and confidence. The survey design was a cross-sectional survey and 510 valid responses have been analysed by partial least squares structural equation modelling. The perceived effectiveness and accessibility, as well as the public confidence were assessed as reflective constructs with 21 items rated on a five-point Likert scale. The measurement model exhibited a good indicator of reliability, internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validities. The findings of structural models revealed that the accessibility positively but significantly influenced perceived efficacy and the confidence of the population. Public confidence was also greatly influenced positively by perceived effectiveness. Indirect mediation was shown to be true as the effect of accessibility on the public confidence based on perceived effectiveness was significant. The model (explained 24.0% and 40.1% of the variance in the perceived effectiveness and public confidence, respectively) and predictive assessment demonstrated the positive out-of-sample relevance. The results indicate that social trust in ADR is not solely on the availability but on the perceived effectiveness, fairness, practicality and credibility of accessible mechanisms in modern practice.</p> Mumtahina Mahmud Sayed Abdullah Bari Samsun nahar Sema Maruf Ahmed Copyright (c) 2026 Muntahina Mahamud, sayed Abdullah bari Rafi, Samsunnahar Sema, Maruf Ahmed http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2026-10-08 2026-10-08 12 1 38 74 10.55327/jaash.v12i1.467