PRIVILEGED WILLS IN MALAYSIA: THE SUSTAINABILITY OF PRIVILEGED WILLS AMONG SOLDIERS, AIRMEN AND SAILORS
Abstract
Privileged wills is the right of soldiers, airmen and sailors to dispose of their property during “actual military service†and “at seaâ€. The sustainability of this right leads to economic prosperity and social justice. The objective of this paper is to examine the sustainability of privileged wills as a model for combating poverty among soldiers, airmen and sailors in Malaysia.  Privileged wills appear to be relevant and important as soldiers, airmen and sailors may dispose of their properties during difficulties in obtaining advice and assistance to make a formal will. Despite the benefit, it is found that it suffered from problems such as the provision of law does not applicable to Muslims and native soldiers and or there is no clear provision of law to guide Muslims and native soldiers to make a privileged wills. The methodology employed in discussing this paper is a qualitative research using doctrinal and comparative approach to the legal systems. This paper analyses legislations governing privileged wills ranging from the Malaysian Wills Act 1959, the Sabah Wills Ordinance (Sabah Cap. 158), Armed Forces Act 1972 (Act 77) and the English Wills Act 1837. The study suggests that the Government of Malaysia should support the idea to extend the provision of law on privileged wills to the Muslims and native soldiers. This is to enable the society to earn and benefit from the property disposed of by soldiers, airmen and sailors.
References
Armed Forces Act 1972 (Act 77).
A.L.G. Goodhart. (1949). 65 L.Q.R. 6, 7. In Patricia Critchley. (1999). Privileged Wills and Testamentary Formalities: A Time to Die?. 58 Cambridge L.J. 49, 55. Retrieved April 29, 2013, from Heinonline database.
Drummond v Parish [1843] 3 Curt 522. 7 Jur 538, 163 ER 812.
English Wills Act 1837.
Everett Paul Griffin, H.E. Chenoweth, Lessing Rosenthal, W.T. Waterman & J.R. Wilson. (1943). Report of the Committee on Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Wills. A.B.A. Sec. Real Prop. Prob. & Tr. Proc. 147. Retrieved April 29, 2013, from Heinonline database.
E.B.M. Note on Mariners’ and Soldiers’ Wills. (1946). 11 Law Sch. Bull. 49. Retrieved April 29, 2013, from Heinonline database.
G. Cole. (1982). How Active is Actual Military Service?.Conv. 185. In Patricia Critchley. (1999). Privileged Wills and Testamentary Formalities: A Time to Die?. 58 Cambridge L.J. 49, 55. Retrieved April 29, 2013, from Heinonline database.
Hunud Abia Kadouf, Faridah Hussain & Saudah Sulaiman, “The Institution of Waqf as a Model for Poverty Alleviation: Lessons from Malaysiaâ€, The International Conference on Waqf 2015 (ICWC2015), Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin Kuala Terengganu. May 10-11, 2015.
In the Estate of Spark [1941] 2 All ER 782.
In the Estate of Wilson; Wilson v Coleclough [1952] 1 All ER 852.
In the Goods of Hiscock [1900-03] All ER Rep 63.
In the Goods of Alfred John Wilson, Decd. Wilson v Coleclough (1952) P. 92.
In Re Godfrey (Deceased) [1944] NZLR 476.
James Schouler. (1915). Law of Wills Executors and Administrators (5th ed.) 445, 453-455. Retrieved April 29, 2013, from Heinonline database.
Justinian’s Institutes. Translation: Institutes II. Translated with an Introduction by Peter Birks and Grant McLeod. With the Latin text of Paul Krueger. 1987. Cornell University Press, 71.
Kitchen, Re Kitchen v Allman (1919) 35 TLR 612.
May v. May [1902] P. 103, n.
Patricia Critchley. (1999). Privileged Wills and Testamentary Formalities: A Time to Die?. 58 Cambridge L.J. 49, 55-58. Retrieved April 29, 2013, from Heinonline database.
Re Stable Dalrymple v Campbell [1918-19] All ER 299.
Re Wingham, Andrew v. Wingham [1949] P. 187.
Re Wingham (deceased): Andrews and Another v Wingham [1948] 2 All ER 908.
Re Booth; Booth v Booth [1926] All ER Rep 594. Also reported [1926] P 118; 95 LJP 64; 135 LT 229; 42 TLR 454.
Re Rapley’s Estate, Rapley v Rapley (1983) 3 All ER 248.
Re Hamilton deceased [1982] NI 197.
Robert J Murphy 11 (1981) Memorandum 81-29 Subject: Study L-603 - Probate Code (Nuncupative Wills), 2.
Sabah Wills Ordinance (Sabah Cap. 158).
St Amaud Mercury. (Vic.: 1914-1918), Saturday 2 February 1918, page 5. Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Wills. Legal Rights of Fighting Man. Retrieved April 29, 2013. http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article91348037.
Thompson on Wills (1936) sec. 32. In E.B.M. Note on Mariners’ and Soldiers’ Wills. (1946). 11 Law Sch. Bull. 49. Retrieved April 29, 2013, from Heinonline database.
T. Weiss. (1947). The Formalities of Testamentary Execution by Service Personnel. 33 Iowa L. Rev. 48, 53, 83-84. In Patricia Critchley. (1999). Privileged Wills and Testamentary Formalities: A Time to Die?. 58 Cambridge L.J. 49, 55-58. Retrieved April 29, 2013, from Heinonline database.
Wills Act 1959 (Act 346).
W. Bowe & D. Parker, Page on the Law of Wills § 20.25. In Robert J Murphy 11 (1981). Memorandum 81-29 Subject: Study L-603 - Probate Code (Nuncupative Wills), 2.
Wills of soldiers on Active Service. (1914). 34 Can. L. Times 1162, 1169-1172. Retrieved April 29, 2013, from Heinonline database.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyrights for articles published in Journal of Asian and African Social Science and Humanities are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
Articles published in Journal of Asian and African Social Science and Humanities are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work as long as they credit you for the original creation.
Â
